Detours of the Brain

Recently, I have felt lost on several levels.

When presented with myriad colleges, and thus majors, and thus occupations, and thus the sum of my entire life, I feel overwhelmed with opportunities.

I feel lost in the questions: where will I attend college? what will I study? how will I pay for it?

To counteract the fluidity and uncertainty of the future, my brain turned to checklists and straight lines for comfort. I started to worry if I have an imbalance of serotonin, a chemical in the brain that affects depression, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsiveness (three issues which have dominated the landscape of my life’s struggles). For a day or two I feared that I somehow have had undiagnosed mild OCD since childhood.

Whoa, Nelly.

Despite phases of real, self-destructive habits (eg. pulling hair out of my scalp in 4th and 6th grade, compulsively exercising and obsessing over food in 9th grade, among others), I’m probably fine.

Why am I thinking about the brain? In the past week I have read Brain Rules by Dr. John Medina and Spark by Dr. John Ratey, one author a molecular biologist and the other a psychiatrist. These books scientifically purport and explain the idea that common issues such as aggression, attention deficit, depression, anxiety, and even just a dulled mind are “neurotransmission malfunctions.” That is to say, these issues  are not moral or intellectual failures and deficiencies. How freeing to imagine that this range of “personality problems” is caused by misfiring neurons and chemical imbalances! When stated in purely biological terms, these often misunderstood and socially stigmatized problems seem less shameful and much less challenging to overcome.

The books about the brain inspire me to pursue psychology or cognitive science; perhaps I will spend my life helping people understand the workings of their brains. I would like to see neurological disorders approached in the manner of an orthodontist wiring crooked teeth with braces. Genes (nature) do factor into these disorders, but environment (nurture) wires the brain’s patterns, and fortunately these patterns can be rewired.

Let me give a personal example. This coming Sunday is two years since I stood before my youth group and confessed what I had been wrestling with for a year prior: pressure to perform, crushing insecurity about my body, and obsessive eating habits.

In the months that followed, I felt that my world had been turned upside down, and I learned truth at a tremendous rate. I detailed this entire story in a post on last year’s anniversary and wrote a poem, and it was all very cathartic.

But this year I feel torn between poetry and science*: The poet says, I learned that my worth is not based on my body or fitness levels, so I live in freedom. The scientist says, I rewired my brain to understand that my image and track ability are not, in fact, threats to my survival.

I’m reminded of the poem “Autobiography in Five Short Chapters” by Portia Nelson, in which the speaker learns to avoid known pitfalls. I posted a paraphrase of the poem on my blog at a time when I, too, was learning to “take a different street.” It’s typical figurative poetry, but in fact, learning on the physical level consists of rewiring the brain. Neurons grow and die and connect in different ways, creating alternative routes and “different streets” for thinking and acting.

The learning process, especially unlearning a bad habit, is difficult at first. But in the same way that I can completely adjust to a detour route that is twice as long as the original, my brain can learn alternative courses of action. Even if a new route takes more effort, I can adjust.

Why am I so interested in rewiring my brain? In honor of my first confession, again I will confess. I want to confess my imperfections, my obsessive-compulsiveness and cognitive dissonance—how I fill  my mouth with broken Pop Tarts, how I write and erase the same word 3 times until it looks just right. Not to mention the fact that I’ve gained 30 pounds in two years… I can’t explain it.

Perhaps the college planning would not feel so overwhelming if I could take confidence from my friendships or something about myself or the faith I claim to have. But I can’t. Like I said, lost.


*I wonder if science and poetry must contradict. I want to embrace both. If I am a scientist, I want to help people understand how their brains work. But as a poet, I just write metaphors using the ideas of researchers and scientists and blame all my issues on “neurotransmission malfunctions” in my brain. Regardless, the two together surely encompass the range of human health: Poetry speaks to the spirit while science addresses the rational mind and the body.

A Bigger Picture?

That thing is happening again. The thing where everything, absolutely everything is stripped away.  All that’s left is me. Little old me. Left to realize I can’t fend for myself. Left to be vulnerable. Left to even hurt a little bit. Left to be a little bit raw and broken, and lonely. Left to wonder why pain is so desirable to some. In my little sea of who knows what, I’m pondering. Maybe something more will come out of all this. Maybe I’ll grow. Maybe I’ll see the big picture later… But right now, it’s hard to think on what tomorrow’s big picture may become when the problems of today are the only things that will come into focus.
I only know this: I can’t do this on my own.

Working to Fill an Emptiness :: My Story, Part III

I left off with a statement about considering people in terms of “good” or “bad” Christians, since “by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast” (Ephesians 2:8-9, NKJV).

A book that really highlighted this for me is TrueFaced, which “draws a clear distinction between two very different underlying motives: my determination to please God or trust him… one results in a striving that never feels it has done enough to please him; the other results in a trust that experiences his full pleasure.”

I read the book during a time of crisis caused by my determination to please, and I realized that I can never earn God’s love or acceptance. When I looked up TrueFaced in the archives of my blog, I found this:

People do not notice when I lose or gain weight.
My friends do not lose respect for me
when I can’t make qualifying times or if I get sick sometimes.
God does not love me any less when I fail to be passionate about Him. And that brings so much freedom.”

Ever since middle school, I’ve faced low self-esteem. When I started high school, I felt friendless, and I had so much to prove. I worried about making qualifying times for cross-country and track, getting bad grades, getting sick, not being a “good” Christian, and gaining weight. All of that drove me to pour so much time and energy into myself. If I did do things for others, it was really just to look good—for approval and personal security.

Continue reading

Theology 101

I recently found myself bombarded with theological thought.

First, I read Why We’re Not Emergent by Kevin DeYoung and Ted Kluck, a book that pinpoints and refutes the emergent church’s wayward beliefs. Amazing book. I didn’t even know what the emergent church was, but now I can tell you what the majority of emergent authors, bloggers, and pastors write and why it’s biblically iffy or just plain wrong.

Then I found another book, at the library: The Unlikely Disciple by Kevin Roose. I wasn’t looking for it; I was just browsing, and later I remembered that I saw this book featured on the blog Pop Parables about a week before. (Side note: this particular blog is worth reading regularly!)

The premise of the book by Kevin Roose, or the “Rooster” as he’s called by friends. the book, hilarious yet serious, is that half of Americans don’t even know one evangelical Christian (as opposed to Quaker or Mormon, which are technically branches of Christianity). It’s called the “God Divide.” Since I’ve grown up surrounded by believers whose life is built around their faith, this was a brand-new idea to me. Apparently the South is a culture all its own, one mysterious to the rest of the country.

These are the topics the author brings up:

  1. The infallibility of the Bible—is it 100% true, accurate, and inspired? How literally should it be taken? (Links go to GotQuestions.org.)
  2. Speaking of literal interpretations: the young-earth creationism taught—no, drilled into the heads of Liberty University students. This was one issue Roose took with the school’s curriculum.
  3. He points out the huge emphasis on refraining from certain behaviors, ie. “following Christian rules,” as opposed to energy spent helping the poor and needy. You know, social justice stuff.
  4. Black-and-white eternal salvation/damnation. This was another big hang-up for Roose, and I’m sure it is for a lot of people. How can a loving God send people to Hell? I read up on it a bit, and I’ve concluded that the inevitable outcome of sin—eternity in Hell, no matter how “good” the person—has more to do with the nature of God than the acts of the people. For God is holy and righteous above all else. God is holy, holy, holy—TRIPLE emphasis on holy, which isn’t found with any of God’s other attributes. Humans, on the other hand, are ALL sinners, therefore, there’s no way God could even tolerate us with our sin. It’s so antithetical to God that he can’t let even the smallest sin pass into Heaven. And, of course, that’s where the Gospel comes in.
  5. Homosexuality. Oh, boy. On one end, there’s Soulforce, an organization whose mission statement is to “expose” and put down all “anti-gay religious groups,” and on the other, there’s the LU roommates who state they would take a baseball bat to any gay person they found.Homosexuality is an example used by people to point out that while Christians ignore most Old Testament instructions/laws, they point to the OT as God’s judgment on same-sex relations. The term I heard, not once but twice, is “cherry-picking.” Honestly, I don’t know how often that happens, but I do know that this point is moot because homosexuality is ALSO denounced in the New Testament (1 Corinthians 6:9-10).This is also a controversial topic in the discussion of the emergent church, which pretty much refuses to denounce homosexuality on the premise of being “loving and accepting like Jesus,” but the problem here is that there’s no healing or encouragement for LGBT churchmembers to change.
  6. The role of women, ie., egalitarianism vs. complementarism. Basically, women are equal to men OR women take a more, well, complementary role. I definitely entertain the second, but ‘the role of women’ is one more topic that I was confronted with both in the book and in some other way recently.
  7. The street evangelism methods that make for an unbelievable backsliding rate. You walk up to someone, try to convert them, and leave. What if they pray for salvation? They need to get plugged into a church. When Kevin Roose spent spring break evangelizing in Daytona Beach, FL, they neglected this aspect.On many missions trips, as one young man in my youth group said, “You go, you do stuff for them, but there’s nothing that lasts…” I agree: that is short-term missions in a nutshell, and 9 times out of 10, it’s really more about personal growth than anything else. Teen Missions is a bit different because it’s so intensive.

Aside: Liberty’s alias is “Bible Boot Camp.” Teen Missions International sends every kid through “the Lord’s Boot Camp” for two weeks. Jerry Falwell started LU in 1971 and Bob Bland started TMI in 1970—they’re similar except that Teen Missions leaves out the politics. Jerry Falwell was an influential figure, apparently. He actually passed away while Roose was at Liberty.

After finishing the book, I received an essay-sized comment on a blog post I wrote two weeks ago about The Unobservable Universe. The post that was equal parts book review and discussion of theological beliefs (or the fact that I don’t have a clue yet), and it sparked some good dialogue.

So, this is several weeks’ worth of metaphysical pondering, but it’s got to be written out, or I’ll never know what I think.

(written in August – hesitant to publish – finally published December)

A definitive gem from Geneen Roth in When You Eat at the Refrigerator, Pull Up a Chair:

Self-Indulgence

— vs. —

Self-Kindness

  • continuing to do what is harmful after you realize it is harmful
  • loathing yourself
  • not asking for help when you need it
  • breaking commitments you’ve made to yourself
  • stopping doing what is harmful to you
  • defending yourself from attacks
  • telling the truth
  • asking for help
  • resting when you need rest